<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thunderbird t-shirts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rebron.org/2008/10/31/thunderbird-t-shirts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rebron.org/2008/10/31/thunderbird-t-shirts/</link>
	<description>Every day life - Work - Ironman Training</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 19:20:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Saunders</title>
		<link>http://www.rebron.org/2008/10/31/thunderbird-t-shirts/comment-page-1/#comment-51569</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Saunders</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 18:40:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rebron.org/?p=1899#comment-51569</guid>
		<description>Definitely a black one, I fully agree with the contrast comment and because of that I really like the bottom 3 then the top 2 (from left to right) and the dark green.
I have nothing against red but I don&#039;t care for the combination of the logo and red together.

Although perhaps not a technically accurate presentation, I think that the logo would look much better without the shadow but I don&#039;t care for it on the logo as it is. It&#039;s messy, kind of smeared looking. There should be a shadow but with less blur. It keeps the logo from looking sharp and crisp.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Definitely a black one, I fully agree with the contrast comment and because of that I really like the bottom 3 then the top 2 (from left to right) and the dark green.<br />
I have nothing against red but I don&#8217;t care for the combination of the logo and red together.</p>
<p>Although perhaps not a technically accurate presentation, I think that the logo would look much better without the shadow but I don&#8217;t care for it on the logo as it is. It&#8217;s messy, kind of smeared looking. There should be a shadow but with less blur. It keeps the logo from looking sharp and crisp.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: G&#38;P</title>
		<link>http://www.rebron.org/2008/10/31/thunderbird-t-shirts/comment-page-1/#comment-51532</link>
		<dc:creator>G&#38;P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 18:58:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rebron.org/?p=1899#comment-51532</guid>
		<description>I like the green and I like the light blue. Are you making women&#039;s t-shirts too? What about fabric? The Google ones are made from bamboo fibers and are super soft!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the green and I like the light blue. Are you making women&#8217;s t-shirts too? What about fabric? The Google ones are made from bamboo fibers and are super soft!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rebron</title>
		<link>http://www.rebron.org/2008/10/31/thunderbird-t-shirts/comment-page-1/#comment-51531</link>
		<dc:creator>rebron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 18:33:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rebron.org/?p=1899#comment-51531</guid>
		<description>A light gray versus a dark gray?  I think a light gray would work.  The colors above since as you&#039;re right it&#039;s a jpg are: light blue, royal blue, navy blue, green, black, red, light gray, light brown, light green.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A light gray versus a dark gray?  I think a light gray would work.  The colors above since as you&#8217;re right it&#8217;s a jpg are: light blue, royal blue, navy blue, green, black, red, light gray, light brown, light green.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Accettura</title>
		<link>http://www.rebron.org/2008/10/31/thunderbird-t-shirts/comment-page-1/#comment-51530</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Accettura</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 18:24:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rebron.org/?p=1899#comment-51530</guid>
		<description>Not sure what they look like in real life, but via the interwebs as a jpg I wonder if there&#039;s enough contrast.  Black is pretty much mandatory, but I think the blue in particular might not pop very much.  For that reason, I think I&#039;d lean towards the gray since it&#039;s a pretty high contrast shirt, and the least &quot;offensive&quot; of the bunch, and by that I mean most people wouldn&#039;t mind the color even if they like another more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure what they look like in real life, but via the interwebs as a jpg I wonder if there&#8217;s enough contrast.  Black is pretty much mandatory, but I think the blue in particular might not pop very much.  For that reason, I think I&#8217;d lean towards the gray since it&#8217;s a pretty high contrast shirt, and the least &#8220;offensive&#8221; of the bunch, and by that I mean most people wouldn&#8217;t mind the color even if they like another more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

