The question is:
- What do you want to see when you first open up your email client?
- Follow-up. If your answer was the last email in your inbox, what if you have no email in your inbox?
- A blank page is not acceptable
- A page that displays project information or product feature information is not the right answer
- Page must be simple, fluid (because of the different views), and easy to localize
- It’s unclear whether the measure of a good start page will be based on activity on that page or high clickthrough since the next step after seeing the Start page is to go to the inbox and check for new email/read email. However, a user will go back to the Mail Start page and then may want to do something from that page after reading email.
Here’s the current Thunderbird start page vert view (above) and in classic view. It’s actually more of a Welcome page versus a Start page where a Start page is something you see everyday and is (can be or should be) useful to you. A Start page is something you *want* to see everyday.
- Gmail’s start page is your inbox and a try something else message if you have no emails in your inbox.
- Yahoo! Mail’s start page is another Front page with weather, news, other info. It’s the “we’re going to try and give you some useful information” but “we’re really only doing this so we can monetize webmail.”
- AOL Mail and Hotmail have a variation of Yahoo!Mail’s start page.
Web Start pages:
- The Firefox Start page is done the way it is because: a) a blank page was not acceptable, b) a page that displayed project or product information was not the right answer, c) it was a simple page and easy to localize, d) high clickthrough rate or activity on the page makes it seem like it was/is the right choice.
- Google has two start pages: google.com and iGoogle or even Google Reader
- Yahoo’s two start pages: yahoo.com and My Yahoo!
- PageFlakes and Netvibes – My Yahoo! and iGoogle-like
- Facebook’s style with info of friend’s activities/requests