<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sins 2.0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rebron.org/2008/03/19/sins-20/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rebron.org/2008/03/19/sins-20/</link>
	<description>Every day life - Work - Ironman Training</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 23:23:21 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kat</title>
		<link>http://www.rebron.org/2008/03/19/sins-20/#comment-49489</link>
		<dc:creator>Kat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 14:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rebron.org/2008/03/19/sins-20/#comment-49489</guid>
		<description>Uh, nos. 4-7 are the same thing.  One cannot follow No. 1 without committing Nos. 5 and 7.  Not to mention that Nos. 1 -2 are some examples of why the Church continues to bleed parishioners.  Interestingly, "child abuse" and "denigration of women" didn't make it onto the "new" list of sins.  Hmmm.  Wonder why.  Vatican's Sin 2.0: same shit, different century.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uh, nos. 4-7 are the same thing.  One cannot follow No. 1 without committing Nos. 5 and 7.  Not to mention that Nos. 1 -2 are some examples of why the Church continues to bleed parishioners.  Interestingly, &#8220;child abuse&#8221; and &#8220;denigration of women&#8221; didn&#8217;t make it onto the &#8220;new&#8221; list of sins.  Hmmm.  Wonder why.  Vatican&#8217;s Sin 2.0: same shit, different century.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://www.rebron.org/2008/03/19/sins-20/#comment-49486</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 22:33:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rebron.org/2008/03/19/sins-20/#comment-49486</guid>
		<description>It's good to see the Vatican "advancing" with modern times. Welcome to the 21st century?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s good to see the Vatican &#8220;advancing&#8221; with modern times. Welcome to the 21st century?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.325 seconds -->
