<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Safari on Windows</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rebron.org/2007/06/12/safari-on-windows/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rebron.org/2007/06/12/safari-on-windows/</link>
	<description>Every day life - Work - Ironman Training</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 19:20:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: california traffic school</title>
		<link>http://www.rebron.org/2007/06/12/safari-on-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-56675</link>
		<dc:creator>california traffic school</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 11:45:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rebron.org/2007/06/12/safari-on-windows/#comment-56675</guid>
		<description>Netscape seems to be integrated with all the Firefox applications. though the functionalities of these browsers are nearly same, they have to come up with Browser Crash function that can reduce the issue. all the browsers are same except the navigation bar and the presentation style etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Netscape seems to be integrated with all the Firefox applications. though the functionalities of these browsers are nearly same, they have to come up with Browser Crash function that can reduce the issue. all the browsers are same except the navigation bar and the presentation style etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Omar Upegui R.</title>
		<link>http://www.rebron.org/2007/06/12/safari-on-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-43939</link>
		<dc:creator>Omar Upegui R.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jun 2007 16:35:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rebron.org/2007/06/12/safari-on-windows/#comment-43939</guid>
		<description>Apple placed its bet with a Safari &quot;a la Windows&quot; and did a terrible job.  The browser continually crashes, freezes or render weird web pages.  If they wanted Apple wanted impress us, they should have waited and come up with a polished product.  I&#039;m afraid it will be another Apple Lisa.

I, for one will keep on using Mozilla Firefox.  In my opinion, this is the best browser around and sets the quality standards for others to follow.

Sorry Jobs.  Safari for Windows is not for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apple placed its bet with a Safari &#8220;a la Windows&#8221; and did a terrible job.  The browser continually crashes, freezes or render weird web pages.  If they wanted Apple wanted impress us, they should have waited and come up with a polished product.  I&#8217;m afraid it will be another Apple Lisa.</p>
<p>I, for one will keep on using Mozilla Firefox.  In my opinion, this is the best browser around and sets the quality standards for others to follow.</p>
<p>Sorry Jobs.  Safari for Windows is not for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rebron</title>
		<link>http://www.rebron.org/2007/06/12/safari-on-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-43119</link>
		<dc:creator>rebron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 19:55:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rebron.org/2007/06/12/safari-on-windows/#comment-43119</guid>
		<description>It took them this long because shipping a browser product isn&#039;t easy!  Plus I&#039;m sure it was more of an upper management hold up than building the browser itself.  I haven&#039;t played with it yet.  I suspect that they don&#039;t necessarily want Safari nor iTunes to be great on Windows.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It took them this long because shipping a browser product isn&#8217;t easy!  Plus I&#8217;m sure it was more of an upper management hold up than building the browser itself.  I haven&#8217;t played with it yet.  I suspect that they don&#8217;t necessarily want Safari nor iTunes to be great on Windows.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Raymond</title>
		<link>http://www.rebron.org/2007/06/12/safari-on-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-43115</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Raymond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 18:34:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rebron.org/2007/06/12/safari-on-windows/#comment-43115</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I&#039;m not surprised at all. In fact, I&#039;m wondering why it took them this long. This is good news for people who want to test their web pages in Safari but don&#039;t own a Mac, and that&#039;s probably part of the reason Apple did it in the first place. It also lets mostly-Apple outfits standardize on a single browser.

As for the QuickTime issue, here&#039;s to hoping the  element makes it into HTML5.

P.S.: Wouldn&#039;t want to be Opera right now, in spite of the fact that they make a darn good browser.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I&#8217;m not surprised at all. In fact, I&#8217;m wondering why it took them this long. This is good news for people who want to test their web pages in Safari but don&#8217;t own a Mac, and that&#8217;s probably part of the reason Apple did it in the first place. It also lets mostly-Apple outfits standardize on a single browser.</p>
<p>As for the QuickTime issue, here&#8217;s to hoping the  element makes it into HTML5.</p>
<p>P.S.: Wouldn&#8217;t want to be Opera right now, in spite of the fact that they make a darn good browser.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

